This story is different.
Porn revenge is slowly becoming a worldwide crime and it's fair to be! Post pictures or private videos of the person online without their permission because they upset you a little? How is that even from a distance?
For a vengeful porn site owner, everything turned against him after his request to remove his image from the sites that talked about his crime was rejected by Google. Now he is at the mercy of the internet ... and the internet is not kind.
Revenge porn site
a 28-year-old man living in America started posting a vengeful porn site where you could "send social media anonymously." You can send nudes anonymously, but you can also include information that could link to the person's mobile number and social networking site.
Why the hell would he do that, I don't know. What's worse is that Brittain made money from the poor victims on the site.
To remove the images from the site, it was said that the victims would be charged up to $ 500 for this "privilege". Yes, in fact, he would be paid to withdraw his own images, which were posted without permission!
There are a lot of words I can think of to describe this guy and one of them ends in the word "cunt"!
Crime
The changes in the law in America meant that its website was illegal and therefore it was not long before the site was banned.
He has since apologized for his crimes, writing the following statement on his website:
"I made a series of weak decisions, then I tried to rationalize them and made it worse. I am sorry for the damage I caused to everyone who came to my site. I fix any opportunity. I apologize. What I did was wrong. "
As you can imagine, this was not enough. People still wanted to pay for what he did.
Ask for image removal
In a fantastic turn of events, Brittain has now gone to Google to ask for links to any stories about his past. His reasoning? They contain "unauthorized photos" with him. An irony!
He tried to invoke copyright law, stating that his permission was not received for those images and that they should be removed. He has done this several times now, trying to use the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) to put Google on his side.
Not surprisingly, they said no.
Apparently, if you were to look at the first changes in America's principles, there is absolutely no valid legal basis for removing the images. Now that's what I call a result!
Is it worth it?
It seems completely ridiculous that he expected Google to remove his images because he didn't give his permission when his site did the exact same thing.
What was expected to happen? Did he really think they would be removed like that?
I'm glad his image is still everywhere on Google, next to the words "closed revenge porn site." He tasted his own medicine. As for me, he deserves it. You can't do something so disgusting.
What do you think? Should Google remove its images? Is his excuse enough to make up for what happened to all those people?
Personally, I don't think it is. "Sorry" does not compensate for such a thing. This is just another lesson about why you should pay attention to who you trust. You agree? Visit the Barby Escorts blog and leave your thoughts in the comments box below
